ICT's in the Clasroom (Google images, 2015) |
Through my exploration of a variety
of ICT tools, I found they have great potential to meet the needs of a variety
of learners and learning styles. When considering learning theories such as
Vygotsky’s (1978) social connectivism, software such as Docx, wikis and weeblys help student’s connect, collaborate
and learn from one another. As Burgelman & Punie (2006) indicated, it can
bring people from different backgrounds, cultures and contexts closer
together. Google Earth, movies and Prezis provide
experiences that help constructivism learners
to see, hear, experience and learn, redefining activities that where once
impossible for a classroom. Chen & Arnold emphasis's this
point in 2002 stating, ICTs can help to overcome two enemies of learning
‘isolation and abstraction’. Within my own teaching fields, it is clear that
ICTs are facilitating the expansion of ideas for continuing mathematical
exploration and can be used to represent scientific phenomena in ways to
improve students understanding of science concepts, ideas, and information
(QSA, 2015).
Connecting the world (Cruz, 2012) |
Many ICT tools are visually and auditorily enhanced to support a variety of
leaning styles, whether it is the audio supported learning through podcasts, the
visual learner through movies and digital images or the kinetic learners through movement orientated
technologies such as Prezi’s and Google Earth.
Every student, no matter their learning style or cognitive development, can be
provided with appropriate learning experience through the right ICTs.
It is the application of the best ICT tool, paired with clear learning
outcomes, content and pedagogy, that enhances learning, so that computer
technology exist not as ends but as supports for student centered learning.
This ICT support can provide all learners with the perfect learning experience
this is especially the case for those learners who have additional learning needs. ICTs can be tailored to provide a great learning experience
and can aid teachers with an alternative method of teaching and assessment.
Instead of students with limited reading and writing missing learning
opportunities, multimedia provides an opportunity for ALL students to
understand and demonstrate their knowledge.
Joyce, G (2014) Blooms and SAMRs model for ICTs |
As shown through my previous blogs and in the above figure,
ICTs have the ability reach all levels of Blooms Taxonomy and the SAMRs model,
they can not only substitute an outdated processes ‘such as Power Point is to
the overhead projector’. They can also be modified further allowing students to
create and produce work with added digital images and movies.
As ICTs change and modify our
activities, the aim is to redefine them to something that was inconceivable
before. This can be achieved through a variety of ICT tools such as wikis, blogs, Prezis websites and Google Earth.
At the redefinition level, students are able create digital portfolios. As
Bloom (1956) explains, before we can create digital portfolios and assignments
through wikis, blogs, Prezis and websites, students must have understood, analysed, and evaluated the new
information, indications of becoming critical and higher order thinkers. ICTs
at this level also provide clear evidence of learning outcomes and as Moyle
(2006) states, digital portfolios were promoted as emerging methods for
assessment and reporting of students’ learning.
My Mind map for using ICT's in the classroom. |
Although technology should enhance
not intrude on the learning that takes place, as Shulman (1986) describes
in TPACK, with
the right choice, good planning and pedagogy, links to curriculum content and
learning outcomes, ICTs can redefine learning activities and aid successful
teaching. Incorporating ICTs into the classroom will prepare learners for the
workplace, as modelling and supporting safe, legal and ethical
practices in the classroom will aid a learner for life. As the QSA (2015)
documents states, educators and students must apply social and ethical
protocols and practices when using ICTs.
I feel it is vital for teachers to keep up to date with technologies
so learners get the best learning experiences and are prepared for the requirements of higher education and the workplace. They also need to address important issues concerning privacy and safety
and educate students to exercise good judgment and digital
responsibility when using all forms of technology. It’s about setting clear
expectations, responsibilities and rules to becoming not only a good social
citizen but a good digital citizen - both in and outside of the classroom.
My example of Class rules from clatcham
References
Bloom, B, Engelhart, M,
Furst, E, Hill, W. & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,
Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc. Retrieved from
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html#cognitive
Burgelman, J-C & Punie, Y. (2006). Information, Society and Technology, pp. 17-33, in E.Aarts & J-L. Encarnação (Eds.), True
Visions: The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence,Springer
Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Chen, M., & Arnold, S. (2002). Day in the life of a young learner: A 2020 Vision, “Transforming Education
and Training Through Advanced Technologies”,U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington. Retrieved
from http://www.technology.gov/
reports/TechPolicy/2020Visions.pdf.
Cruz, X. (2012). [Digital Image] Enterprise
ICT Strategy Meets Cloud Services. Retrieved from http://cloudtimes.org/page/9/
CQUniversity Australia. (2013). EDED20491- ICTs for learning design: online learning materials. Retrieved from http://moodle.cqu.edu.au/mod/page/view.php?id=115325
Google images (2015). [Digital Image] ICT's in the Classroom. Retrieved from http://techmoran.com/nigeria-ict-consumer-spending-smash-167-billion-next-five-years/
Joyce, G. (2014). Blog spot. Retrieved from http://geoffajoyce.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/linking-blooms-taxonomy-with-samr-model.html
Joyce, G. (2014). Blog spot. Retrieved from http://geoffajoyce.blogspot.com.au/2014/03/linking-blooms-taxonomy-with-samr-model.html
Moyle, k. (2006). Leadership and learning with ICT'. Teaching
Australia - Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership 2006. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/leadership_and_learning_with_ict_-_voices_from_the_profession
Punie, Y., Zinnbauer, D., & Cabrera, M. (2006). A Review of the Impact of ICT on Learning, Working
Paper prepared for DG EAC, October 2006. Retrieved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC47246.TN.pdf
QSA (2015). Australian Curriculum in Queensland, Queensland Studies Authority, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge
growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14. Retrieved from http://www.intime.uni.edu/model/teacher/teac2summary.html
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment